20:53 Jun 19, 2013  

Linde India Ltd

HSL Code: BOCLTD   |   BSE Code: 523457  |   NSE Symbol: LINDEINDIA  |   ISIN: INE473A01011
288.00
-1.40(-0.48%)
19 Jun 2013 | 15:55
Prev Close (Rs.)
289.40
Open (Rs.)
292.00
High (Rs.)
292.00
Low (Rs.)
280.85
Volume
11,030
Week Avg. Volume
12,674
52Wk High - Low Range
230.20
473.95
 
 



AUDITORS





.

To the members of BOC India Limited

We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of BOC India Limited (’the Company‘) as at 31 December 2012 and also the related Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003, as amended (’Order‘), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- Section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:

a) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those books;

c) the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211of the Companies Act, 1956;

e) on the basis of written representations received from directors as on 31 December 2012 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 December 2012 from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 274 (1) (g) of the Companies Act, 1956;

f) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:

• in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of the affairs of the Company as at 31 December 2012;

• in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for the year ended on that date; and

• in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.

For BSR& Co. Kolkata
Chartered Accountants 4 February 2013
Firm Registration No.: 101248W
Vikram Advani, Partner
Membership No.: 091765

Annexure to the auditors’ report.*

I. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its fixed assets by which all fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.

II. a) The inventory, except goods-in-transit has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable.

b) The procedures for the physical verification of inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.

c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records were not material.

III. The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured, to or from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

IV. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, and having regard to the explanation that purchases of certain items of inventories and fixed assets are for the Company’s specialised requirements and suitable alternative sources are not available to obtain comparable quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventories and fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. We have not observed any major weakness in the internal control system during the course of the audit.

V. a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the particulars of the contract or arrangement referred to in Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the register required to be maintained under that Section.

b) Under the aforesaid contract or arrangement, certain services that are rendered by the Company as per the specialised requirements of a buyer and the value of such services exceeds Rs. 0.50 million during the year, suitable alternative sources are not available to obtain comparable quotations. However, on the basis of information and explanations provided, the same appear reasonable.

VI. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the year.

VII. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.

VIII. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the rules prescribed by the Central Government for maintenance of cost records under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of the products and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the records.

IX. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts deducted / accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees’ State Insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Cess and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with appropriate authorities.

According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees’ State Insurance, Income tax, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 December 2012 for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.

b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of Income tax, Customs duty, Wealth tax and Cess which have not been deposited with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.

According to the information and explanations given to us, dues of Sales tax, Service tax and Excise duty which have not been deposited by the Company on account of any dispute are listed below:

Name of the Statute Nature of dues Amount in (Rs. million)* Period to which amount relates Forum where the dispute is pending
Central State Sales Tax Act and VAT Acts Sales tax/VAT 2.53 1982– 1992 High Court
1981– 1982
1983– 1984
1986– 1987
180.99 1992– 2009 Revisional Board
1993– 1994
1995– 1997
2003– 2006
31.12** 2008– 2010 Tribunal
1997– 1998
2003– 2006
46.12 2006– 2011 Joint Commissioner (Appeals) of Commercial Taxes
1990– 1991
2004– 2006
64.80 2009– 2011 Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) of Commercial Taxes
7.87 2002– 2003 Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
2.05 2007– 2008 Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
1998– 1999
2001– 2003
5.03 2005– 2007 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Central Excise Act, 1994 Excise duty 21.72 1999– 2009 Supreme Court
1998– 2001
10.49 2008– 2009 High Court
118.70*** 1991– 2011 Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
7.89 1991– 2010 Commissioner (Appeals)
24.69 2007– 2010 Commissioner of Central Excise
1996– 2000
15.24 2007– 2012 Additional Commissioner
2.89 2006– 2010 Deputy Commissioner
5.07 2005– 2012 Assistant Commissioner
Finance Act, 1994 Service tax 32.40 2005– 2008 Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
5.94 2005– 2010 Commissioner (Appeals)
121.48 2004– 2010 Commissioner of Service Tax
2004– 2007
4.35 2009– 2010 Additional Commissioner
0.13 2009– 2011 Deputy Commissioner
6.49 2007– 2011 Assistant Commissioner

* Excluding the demands the proceedings of which have been set aside or remanded for reassessment by the appropriate authorities.

** Including disputed dues aggregating to Rs. 25.64 million in respect of sales tax dispute, which have been stayed by respective authorities.

*** Including disputed dues aggregating to Rs. 81.76 million in respect of Excise dispute, which have been stayed by respective authorities.

X. The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the financial year and has not incurred cash losses in the financial year and in the immediately preceding financial year.

XI. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

XII. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

XIII. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund / society.

XIV. According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and other investments.

XV. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

XVI. Based on the information and explanations given to us by the management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.

XVII. According to the information and explanations given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we are of the opinion that the Company has used funds raised on short term basis amounting to Rs. 648.19 million for long term investments.

XVIII. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to companies / firms / parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

XIX. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

XX. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the year.

XXI. According to the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.

For BSR& Co. Kolkata
Chartered Accountants 4 February 2013
Firm Registration No.: 101248W
Vikram Advani, Partner
Membership No.: 091765
???
 
Fetching Data...