17:37 May 22, 2013  

Premier Ltd

HSL Code: PREAUT   |   BSE Code: 500540  |   NSE Symbol: PREMIER  |   ISIN: INE342A01018
77.90
4.40(5.99%)
22 May 2013 | 15:52
Prev Close (Rs.)
73.50
Open (Rs.)
77.00
High (Rs.)
82.80
Low (Rs.)
75.00
Volume
1,03,168
Week Avg. Volume
17,179
52Wk High - Low Range
62.90
151.40
 
 
PREMIER LIMITED

ANNUAL REPORT 2011-2012

AUDITORS` REPORT

To 
The Members of 
Premier Limited

(1)  We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Premier Ltd. as at  31st 
March 2012, and also the Statement of Profit and Loss Account and the  Cash 
Flow  Statement  for  the year ended on that date  annexed  thereto.  These 
financial  statements are the responsibility of the  Company`s  management. 
Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial  statements 
based on our audit.

(2)  We  conducted  our audit in accordance  with  the  auditing  standards 
generally  accepted  in  India. Those Standards require that  we  plan  and 
perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the 
financial  statements are free of material misstatement. An audit  includes 
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures 
in  the  financial  statements.  An  audit  also  includes  assessing   the 
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as 
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe 
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

(3) As required by the Companies (Auditor`s Report) Order, 2003, as amended 
by the Companies (Auditor`s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004, issued by  the 
Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227  of 
the  Companies  Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a  statement  on  the 
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.

(4)  Further  to our comments in the Annexure referred to  in  paragraph  3 
above, we report that:

i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the best 
of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit;

ii.  In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law  have  been 
kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of those books

iii.  The  balance  sheet,  statement of profit  and  loss  and  cash  flow 
statement  dealt  with by this report are in agreement with  the  books  of 
account

iv.  In  our opinion, the balance sheet, statement of profit and  loss  and 
cash  flow statement dealt with by this report comply with  the  accounting 
standards  referred to in sub,section (3C) of section 211 of the  Companies 
Act, 1956.

v. On the basis of written representations received from the directors,  as 
on  31st  March,  2012 and taken on record by the Board  of  Directors,  we 
report  that  none of the directors of the Company are disqualified  as  on 
31st March, 2012 from being appointed as a director, in terms of clause (g) 
of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;

vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information -and according to the 
explanations  given to us, the said financial statements together with  the 
significant  accounting  policies and notes thereon, give  the  information 
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and  present 
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally 
accepted in India:

a. in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company 
as at 31st March, 2012;

b. in the case of the statement of profit and loss , of the profit for  the 
year ended on that date; and

c.  in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the  year 
ended on that date.

For K.S. Aiyar & Co. 
Chartered Accountants 
Firm Registration No. 100186W

Raghuvir M. Aiyar 
Partner 
(M No.- 38128)

Place : Mumbai
Date  : 25th April `12

ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS` REPORT

Re: Premier Limited

Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date,

(i)  a. The Company has maintained proper records showing full  particulars 
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

b. A substantial portion of the fixed assets have been physically  verified 
by  the  management  during  the year. In  our  opinion  the  frequency  of 
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the 
nature  of its assets. The discrepancies noticed on  physical  verification 
were not material and properly dealt with in the books of account.

c.  The  fixed assets disposed off during the year  were  not  substantial. 
According  to  the information and explanation given to us; we are  of  the 
opinion  that the disposal of the fixed assets has not affected  the  going 
concern status of the Company.

(ii)a.  The inventory has been physically verified during the year  by  the 
management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.

b.  The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by  the 
management  are  reasonable  and adequate in relation to the  size  of  the 
company and the nature of its business.

c.  In  our  opinion and according to the explanations  given  to  us,  the 
company  is  maintaining  proper records of  inventory.  The  discrepancies 
noticed  on verification between the physical stocks and the  book  records 
were not material and properly dealt with in the books of account.

(iii) a. The Company has granted unsecure . loans to one company covered in 
the  register  maintained  under section 301 of  the  Companies  Act,  1956 
wherein  the balance recoverable as at the period end is  Rs.101.56  Lakhs. 
(Maximum balance during the year Rs.101.56 Lakhs)

b. The above Loan has been given to an entity wherein the Company has  also 
made  strategic investment and therefore it is interest free. We have  been 
informed by the management that in view of the revival plan envisaged,  the 
rate  of  interest  and other terms and conditions of loans  given  by  the 
Company,  secured  or unsecured to the said party listed  in  the  register 
maintained  under  section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 are  not,  prima-
facie, prejudicial to the interest of the Company.

c.  In respect of the above loan granted there is no stipulation as  regard 
receipt/renewal of the principal amount.

d. There is no overdue amount of more than rupees one lakh of loans granted 
to  companies,  firms or other parties listed in  the  register  maintained 
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.

e.  The Company has taken unsecured- loan from eight parties listed in  the 
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act,1956 wherein the 
balance  payable  as  at the year end is Rs. 1575  Lakhs  (Maximum  balance 
outstanding during the year Rs 1960 Lakhs).

f.  In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us, the  rate 
of  interest and other terms and conditions of the aforesaid loan are  not, 
prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.

g.  In  our  opinion and according to the explanations  given  to  us,  the 
company is regular in paying the principal and interest as stipulated.

(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given 
to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate with the size 
of  the company and the nature of its business with regard to purchases  of 
inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and  services. 
During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing failure 
to correct major weakness in the internal control system.

(v) a. According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of 
the  opinion that the particulars of contracts or arrangements referred  to 
in  Section  301  of  the Companies. Act, 1956 have  been  entered  in  the 
register required to be maintained under that section.

b. There are no transactions made for purchase or sale of goods or services 
exceeding  the value of five lakh rupees in respect of any party listed  in 
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act,1956.

(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given 
to  us,  the company has complied with the provisions of Sections  58A  and 
58AA  or  any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act,1956  and  the 
Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the  deposits 
accepted  from the public. As informed to us, no order has been  passed  by 
the  Company Law Board, National Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of  India  or 
any other court or any other tribunal.

(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system commensurate 
with the size and nature of its business.

(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to materials, 
labour  and other items of cost maintained by the company pursuant  to  the 
Rules  made by the Central Government for the maintenance of  cost  records 
under  Section  209 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and we  are  of  the 
opinion  that  prima facie the prescribed accounts and  records  have  been 
made.  and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination  of 
the records for determining whether they are accurate or complete.

(ix)  a.  The company is generally regular in depositing  with  appropriate 
authorities  undisputed statutory dues regarding wealth  tax,customs  duty, 
excise duty, cess and other statutory dues applicable to it.

b.  According to the records of the Company, there are no  undisputed  dues 
payable  in respect of provident fund, employees` state insurance,  income-
tax, sales tax, service tax which are outstanding for more than six  months 
from the date they become payable as of 31st March, 2012.

Investor Education and Protection Fund of Rs.0.21 lakhs has remained unpaid 
for  a period of more than six months from the date it has become  payable. 
The same has been retained by the Company as per the orders of the  Kolkata 
High Court.

c. According to the records of the company, the disputed statutory dues  on 
accounts  of  sale tax, income-tax, customs  tax/wealth-tax,  service  Tax, 
excise  duty/cess which have not been deposited on account of  any  dispute 
are as follows:

Sl.   A            B        C          D           E

1. The Central  Penalty   10.00   1997 to 2000   CESTAT
   Excise Act

2. The Central  Excise     4.92   July, 1996     CESTAT sent the            
   Excise Act   Duty       0.50   to Sept.,      matter for de-novo     
                Penalty           1996           adjudication to the    
                                                 Assistant Commissioner 
                                                 of Central Excise.     

3. FEMA         Penalty   65.49   1996-97        Directorate of Enforcement
                                                 has appealed to the
                                                 Supreme Court.

4. The Central  Excise    26.43   May, 1992      CESTAT      
   Excise Act   Duty              to         
                                  Sept., 1992

5. The Central  Excise    11.10   June, 1989     CESTAT
   Excise Act   Duty      11.10   
                Penalty 

A = Name of the Statute
B = Nature of the Dues
C = Amount Rs. in Lakhs
D = Period to which the amount relates
E = Forum where between dispute is pending

(x)  The  Company does not have any accumulated losses at the  end  of  the 
financial  year.  The company has not incurred any cash losses  during  the 
financial  year  covered  by  our audit and  also  during  the  immediately 
preceding financial year.

(xi)  In  our opinion and according to the-  information  and  explanations 
given  to  us,  the Company has not defaulted in repayment  of  dues  to  a 
financial institution or bank during the year.

(xii) The Company has not granted any loans on the basis of security by way 
of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.

(xiii)  The  Company  is not a chit fund or a  nidhi/mutual  benefit  fund/ 
society.  Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Order are  not 
applicable to the company.

(xiv)  In  our opinion and accoroing to the  information  and  explanations 
given  to  us,  the  Company  is not  dealing  in  or  trading  in  shares, 
securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly the provisions of 
clause 4 (xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the company.

(xv) The Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from 
bank or financial institutions.

(xvi)  In  our opinion and according to the  information  and  explanations 
given  to us, term loans have been applied for the purpose for  which  they 
were raised.

(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on  an 
overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report that Rs. 
9699.86  Lakhs  raised on short- term basis have been  used  for  long-term 
investment/applications.

(xviii)  The Company has not made any preferential allotment of  shares  to 
parties and companies covered in the register maintained under section  301 
of the Companies Act, 1956.

(xix) The Company has not issued any secured debentures during the year nor 
it has any outstanding debentures during the year.

(xx) The Company has not raised money by public issues during the year.

(xxi)  According to the information and explanations given to us, no  fraud 
on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of  our 
audit.

For K.S. Aiyar & Co.
Chartered Accountants 
Firm Registration No. 100186W

Raghuvir M. Aiyar 
Partner 
(M No.- 38128)

Place : Mumbai
Date  : 25th April `12
 
Fetching Data...